Yeah, OK once your local test passes :)
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 4:38 PM Christoph Müllner
wrote:
>
> Is it OK to backport to GCC 14 (patch applies cleanly, test is running)?
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 9:25 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
> >
> > LGTM :)
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 3:16 PM Christoph Mü
Is it OK to backport to GCC 14 (patch applies cleanly, test is running)?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 9:25 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> LGTM :)
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 3:16 PM Christoph Müllner
> wrote:
> >
> > It is possible that the Zba optimization pattern zero_extendsidi2_bitmanip
> > matches for
LGTM :)
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 3:16 PM Christoph Müllner
wrote:
>
> It is possible that the Zba optimization pattern zero_extendsidi2_bitmanip
> matches for a XTheadMemIdx INSN with the effect of emitting an invalid
> instruction as reported in PR116035.
>
> The pattern above is used to emit a z
It is possible that the Zba optimization pattern zero_extendsidi2_bitmanip
matches for a XTheadMemIdx INSN with the effect of emitting an invalid
instruction as reported in PR116035.
The pattern above is used to emit a zext.w instruction to zero-extend
SI mode registers to DI mode. A similar func
