.@rivai.ai
Date: 2024-01-19 15:53
To: Li Xu; gcc-patches
CC: kito.cheng; palmer; zhengyu; pan2.li; Li Xu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Bugfix for resolve_overloaded_builtin[PR113420]
Could you add a test for vle with mask?
For example:
__riscv_vle8 which overload __riscv_vle8_v_i8mf8_m and __riscv
CC: kito.cheng; palmer; zhengyu; pan2.li; Li Xu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Bugfix for resolve_overloaded_builtin[PR113420]
Could you add a test for vle with mask?
For example:
__riscv_vle8 which overload __riscv_vle8_v_i8mf8_m and __riscv_vle8_v_u8mf8_m
You are using pointer type and mask type
01-19 15:44
To: gcc-patches
CC: kito.cheng; palmer; juzhe.zhong; zhengyu; pan2.li; xuli
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Bugfix for resolve_overloaded_builtin[PR113420]
From: xuli
Change the hash value of overloaded intrinsic from considering
all parameter types to:
1. Encoding vector data type
2. In
From: xuli
Change the hash value of overloaded intrinsic from considering
all parameter types to:
1. Encoding vector data type
2. In order to distinguish vle8_v_i8mf8_m(vbool64_t vm, const int8_t *rs1,
size_t vl)
and vle8_v_u8mf8_m(vbool64_t vm, const uint8_t *rs1, size_t vl), encode the
poi
