On Tue, 9 Jan 2024, Jeff Law wrote:
> > Depending on how you look at it you may qualify this as a bug fix (for
> > the commit referred; it's surely rare enough a case I missed in original
> > testing) or a missed optimisation. Either way it's a narrow-scoped very
> > small change, almost an obv
On 1/7/24 17:06, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
Complement commit c1e8cb3d9f94 ("RISC-V: Rework branch costing model for
if-conversion") and also handle extraneous sign extend operations that
are sometimes produced by `noce_try_cmove_arith' instead of zero extend
operations, making branch costing co
Complement commit c1e8cb3d9f94 ("RISC-V: Rework branch costing model for
if-conversion") and also handle extraneous sign extend operations that
are sometimes produced by `noce_try_cmove_arith' instead of zero extend
operations, making branch costing consistent. It is unclear what the
condition
