On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:09 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 09:53 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:53 PM, David Malcolm
>> wrote:
>> > Design questions:
>> >
>> > * The patch introduces a new kind of tree node, currently called
>> > DECL_WRAPPER_EXPR (a
On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 09:53 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:53 PM, David Malcolm
> wrote:
> > Design questions:
> >
> > * The patch introduces a new kind of tree node, currently called
> > DECL_WRAPPER_EXPR (although it's used for wrapping constants as
> > well
> > as
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:53 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> Design questions:
>
> * The patch introduces a new kind of tree node, currently called
> DECL_WRAPPER_EXPR (although it's used for wrapping constants as well
> as decls). Should wrappers be a new kind of tree node, or should they
> reu
[following up on a discussion at Cauldron]
This is a work-in-progress attempt at retaining source-location
information for uses of variables and for constants: the tree nodes
that don't have an EXPR_LOCATION in our internal representation.
I'm posting the patch now to check that my approach is co
