On 09/25/14 15:10, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Hi!
Resending this email. Seems some spam filter ate it due to the many
email addresses...
Following up on my suggestion to put all email addresses into <...>
(cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-09/msg00298.html) here's an
actual patch. Quite a mech
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 03:14:16PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:10:00PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> >> Resending this email. Seems some spam filter ate it due to the many
> >> email addresses...
> >
>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:10:00PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>> Resending this email. Seems some spam filter ate it due to the many
>> email addresses...
>
> Will now all/most/many further patches to MAINTAINERS hit spam filters
> a
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:10:00PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Resending this email. Seems some spam filter ate it due to the many
> email addresses...
Will now all/most/many further patches to MAINTAINERS hit spam filters
as well?
Segher
Hi!
Resending this email. Seems some spam filter ate it due to the many
email addresses...
Following up on my suggestion to put all email addresses into <...>
(cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-09/msg00298.html) here's an
actual patch. Quite a mechanical change, along with a few clean-ups of
s