Re: [PATCH] Properly limit backwards label scanning in reorg.

2011-10-30 Thread Richard Guenther
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 8:49 AM, David Miller wrote: > > My check-gcc runs are completely dominated by the time it takes to > test compile.exp=20001226-1.c > > On sparc when compiling this function at -O1 the lowest hanging fruit > is some sillyness in reorg.  It is trying to test a very specific

[PATCH] Properly limit backwards label scanning in reorg.

2011-10-30 Thread David Miller
My check-gcc runs are completely dominated by the time it takes to test compile.exp=20001226-1.c On sparc when compiling this function at -O1 the lowest hanging fruit is some sillyness in reorg. It is trying to test a very specific condition within a well contained code block, but the label scan