OK, thanks.
Jason
On 16/04/12 16:23, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 04/14/2012 05:43 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> + tree expr = NULL;
>> + append_to_statement_list (*block,&expr);
>> + *block = expr;
Rather than doing this dance here, I think it would be better to enhance
appe
On 04/14/2012 05:43 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> + tree expr = NULL;
>> + append_to_statement_list (*block,&expr);
>> + *block = expr;
>
> Rather than doing this dance here, I think it would be better to enhance
> append_to_statement_list to handle the case of the list argument
Jason,
On 18/02/12 09:33, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 01/22/2012 03:38 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>
> Sorry I didn't notice this patch until now; please CC me on C++ patches,
> or at least mention C++ in the subject line.
>
OK, will do.
>> + tree expr = NULL;
>> + append_to_statement_lis
On 01/22/2012 03:38 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
Sorry I didn't notice this patch until now; please CC me on C++ patches,
or at least mention C++ in the subject line.
+ tree expr = NULL;
+ append_to_statement_list (*block, &expr);
+ *block = expr;
Rather than doing this dance here
On 09/12/11 10:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Jakub,
>>
>> This patch fixes the problem reported in
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25973#c4 .
>>
>> The test-case listed there is:
>> ...
>> struct Block
>> {
>> public:
>>Blo
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Jakub,
>
> This patch fixes the problem reported in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25973#c4 .
>
> The test-case listed there is:
> ...
> struct Block
> {
> public:
> Block();
> ~Block();
> };
>
> bool func( bool bar )
> {
Jakub,
This patch fixes the problem reported in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25973#c4 .
The test-case listed there is:
...
struct Block
{
public:
Block();
~Block();
};
bool func( bool bar )
{
Block block;
bool foo = false;
if( !foo || bar )
do { return true; }
