On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 05:20:52PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 05:49:12PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > > > -/* Return true if we have D-form addressing in altivec registers. */
> > > > +/* Return true if we have D-form addressing (register+offset) in
> > > > e
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 05:49:12PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > > -/* Return true if we have D-form addressing in altivec registers. */
> > > +/* Return true if we have D-form addressing (register+offset) in either a
> > > + specific reload register class or whether some reload register cl
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 06:14:27PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:22:10PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > 2018-05-03 Michael Meissner
> >
> > * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (mode_supports_d_form): Rename
> > mode_supports_vmx_dform to mode_supports_d_form. A
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:22:10PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> 2018-05-03 Michael Meissner
>
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (mode_supports_d_form): Rename
> mode_supports_vmx_dform to mode_supports_d_form. Add an optional
> argument to say which reload register class to use.
These patches were previously posted in March as a RFC, and I would like to
check them into the trunk. These patches make the mode_supports* functions use
similar names for the functions that return if a mode supports D-FORM, DS-FORM,
and/or DQ-FORM instructions, and add the ability to ask whether
