On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Michael Meissner
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:24:25PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Michael Meissner
>> wrote:
>> > In backporting the power8 changes to the 4.8 branch, one of the testers of
>> > these patches noticed that l
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:24:25PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Michael Meissner
> wrote:
> > In backporting the power8 changes to the 4.8 branch, one of the testers of
> > these patches noticed that libgcc cannot be built on a linux SPE target.
> > The
> > reas
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Michael Meissner
wrote:
> In backporting the power8 changes to the 4.8 branch, one of the testers of
> these patches noticed that libgcc cannot be built on a linux SPE target. The
> reason was the _Decimal64 type did not have a proper move insn in the SPE
> environ
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Michael Meissner
wrote:
> In backporting the power8 changes to the 4.8 branch, one of the testers of
> these patches noticed that libgcc cannot be built on a linux SPE target. The
> reason was the _Decimal64 type did not have a proper move insn in the SPE
> environ
In backporting the power8 changes to the 4.8 branch, one of the testers of
these patches noticed that libgcc cannot be built on a linux SPE target. The
reason was the _Decimal64 type did not have a proper move insn in the SPE
environment. This patch fixes that issue. In looking at the patch, I
d
