On Mon, 26 Mar 2012, Razya Ladelsky wrote:
> > +
> > + /* if the latch contains more than the one statemnt of control
> variable
> > + increment then it contains the body. */
> > + if (exit_1->dest == loop->latch && last_and_only_stmt (loop->latch))
> > new_rhs = gimple_cond_rhs (co
> +
> + /* if the latch contains more than the one statemnt of control
variable
> + increment then it contains the body. */
> + if (exit_1->dest == loop->latch && last_and_only_stmt (loop->latch))
> new_rhs = gimple_cond_rhs (cond_stmt);
>
> please check what the comment suggests, t
Richard Guenther wrote on 26/03/2012 01:23:15 PM:
> From: Richard Guenther
> To: Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Date: 26/03/2012 01:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Permanent Fix for PR46886
>
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012, Razya Ladelsky wrote:
>
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012, Razya Ladelsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is (hopefully) a permanent fix to pr46886.c
> I removed the condition preventing parallelization of do_while loops, as
> it
> was blocking parallelizing important loops in spec-2006.
> The patch fixes the number of iterations for cases
Hi,
This is (hopefully) a permanent fix to pr46886.c
I removed the condition preventing parallelization of do_while loops, as
it
was blocking parallelizing important loops in spec-2006.
The patch fixes the number of iterations for cases where the body could
appear in the latch, as in pr46886.c
