On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:07:10PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2011-10-26 Martin Jambor
>> >
>> > * ipa-prop.c (mark_modified): Moved
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:07:10PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > 2011-10-26 Martin Jambor
> >
> > * ipa-prop.c (mark_modified): Moved up in the file.
> > (is_parm_modified_before_call): Renamed t
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Honza requested that we do attempt to produce pass-through jump
> functions even when the actual formal parameter that is being passed
> on is addressable - provided that we can prove it has not changed
> value, of course. The follow
Hi,
Honza requested that we do attempt to produce pass-through jump
functions even when the actual formal parameter that is being passed
on is addressable - provided that we can prove it has not changed
value, of course. The following patch does this, hopefully the
limitations of our parameter-no
