5, Tamar Christina wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > > From: Richard Biener
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 2:56 PM
> > > > > > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > > > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2025 9:15 AM
> To: Andrew Pinski
> Cc: Tamar Christina ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; RISC-
> V CI
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Pass reduction var to vectorize_fold_left_reduction
> directly
>
&g
ednesday, August 27, 2025 2:56 PM
> > > > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > > > Cc: RISC-V CI ; Tamar Christina
> > > >
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] Pass reduction var to vectorize_fold_left_reduction
> > > > directly
> > > >
> >
gnu.org
> > > Cc: RISC-V CI ; Tamar Christina
> > >
> > > Subject: [PATCH] Pass reduction var to vectorize_fold_left_reduction
> > > directly
> > >
> > > Instead of going via the PHI node def, use the scalar reduction
> > > input from the reduct
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025, Tamar Christina wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard Biener
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 2:56 PM
> > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > Cc: RISC-V CI ; Tamar Christina
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH] Pass redu
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 2:56 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: RISC-V CI ; Tamar Christina
>
> Subject: [PATCH] Pass reduction var to vectorize_fold_left_reduction directly
>
> Instead of going vi
Instead of going via the PHI node def, use the scalar reduction
input from the reduction stmt.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Sorry for the re-post, this is now re-based on pristine trunk,
hopefully making git am happy.
* tree-vect-loop.cc (vectorize_fold_left_reduc
Instead of going via the PHI node def, use the scalar reduction
input from the reduction stmt.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. I'll wait
for risc-v CI and hope for aarch64 CI as well ...
Thanks,
Richard.
* tree-vect-loop.cc (vectorize_fold_left_reduction): Get
