Re: [PATCH] PR92398: Fix testcase failure of pr72804.c

Hi! On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 09:12:32PM -0600, Xiong Hu Luo wrote: > P9LE generated instruction is not worse than P8LE. > mtvsrdd;xxlnot;stxv vs. not;not;std;std. > Update the test case to fix failures. So this no longer runs it for p7, and it also doesn't run it for cpus after p9 anymore. Could

Re: [PATCH] PR92398: Fix testcase failure of pr72804.c

On 2019/11/15 11:12, Xiong Hu Luo wrote: P9LE generated instruction is not worse than P8LE. mtvsrdd;xxlnot;stxv vs. not;not;std;std. Update the test case to fix failures. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-11-15 Luo Xiong Hu testsuite/pr92398 * gcc.target/powerpc/pr7280

[PATCH] PR92398: Fix testcase failure of pr72804.c

P9LE generated instruction is not worse than P8LE. mtvsrdd;xxlnot;stxv vs. not;not;std;std. Update the test case to fix failures. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-11-15 Luo Xiong Hu testsuite/pr92398 * gcc.target/powerpc/pr72804.h: New. * gcc.target/powerpc/pr7280