On 6/5/19 10:17 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Thanks for the patch and sorry that there was no response.
I've added the C++ maintainers to cc:
Thanks. In the future, mentioning C++ in the subject line will help me
see it.
On 2019-04-08 7:20 p.m., Nicholas Krause wrote:
This fixes the calle
Thanks for the patch and sorry that there was no response.
I've added the C++ maintainers to cc:
nick writes:
> I'm pinging this patch as it's old now and should be applied to fix the bug.
>
> Nick
>
> On 2019-04-08 7:20 p.m., Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> This fixes the caller in tsubst_requires_exp
I'm pinging this patch as it's old now and should be applied to fix the bug.
Nick
On 2019-04-08 7:20 p.m., Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This fixes the caller in tsubst_requires_expr to
> tsubst_constraint_variables to wrap their respective
> trees in PARM_CONSTR_PARMS. This is to get the correct
> pa
This fixes the caller in tsubst_requires_expr to
tsubst_constraint_variables to wrap their respective
trees in PARM_CONSTR_PARMS. This is to get the correct
parmeter constraints from the tree before calling
tsubst_constraint_variables like other callers
in constraint.cc and to fix the bug id, 88395
This fixes both callers in tsubst_requires_expr to
tsubst_constraint_variables to wrap their respective
trees in PARM_CONSTR_PARMS. This is to get the correct
parmeter constraints from the tree before calling
tsubst_constraint_variables like other callers
in constraint.cc and to fix the bug id, 883
This fixes bug id,88395 by checking if the second tree reqs
is correctly not a null pointer before calling the function,
tsubst_requirement_body. Otherwise we will get a nullptr
if compiling with -fconcepts for concepts enabled.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
---
gcc/cp/constraint.cc | 2 ++
1 f
