On 10.09.2018 19:53, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 04:05:26PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> On 20.08.2018 16:30, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 08/18/2018 03:20 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Eric, didn't your patches explicitely handle this case of a non-constant
> inbetween?
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 04:05:26PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> On 20.08.2018 16:30, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 08/18/2018 03:20 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >>> Eric, didn't your patches explicitely handle this case of a non-constant
> >>> inbetween?
> >>
> >> Only if there is no overlap at all, othe
On 20.08.2018 16:30, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/18/2018 03:20 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>>> Eric, didn't your patches explicitely handle this case of a non-constant
>>> inbetween?
>>
>> Only if there is no overlap at all, otherwise you cannot do things simply.
>>
>>> Can you have a look / review here?
On 08/18/2018 03:20 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Eric, didn't your patches explicitely handle this case of a non-constant
>> inbetween?
>
> Only if there is no overlap at all, otherwise you cannot do things simply.
>
>> Can you have a look / review here?
>
> Jakub is probably more qualified to gi
> Eric, didn't your patches explicitely handle this case of a non-constant
> inbetween?
Only if there is no overlap at all, otherwise you cannot do things simply.
> Can you have a look / review here?
Jakub is probably more qualified to give a definitive opinion, as he wrote
check_no_overlap and
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 1:35 PM Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>
> From: Andreas Krebbel
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x and x86_64.
Eric, didn't your patches explicitely handle this case of a non-constant
inbetween? Can you have a look / review here?
Thanks,
Richard.
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2018
From: Andreas Krebbel
Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x and x86_64.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018-08-07 Andreas Krebbel
PR tree-optimization/86844
* gimple-ssa-store-merging.c (check_no_overlap): Add a check to
reject overlaps if it has seen a non-constant store in between.