On April 8, 2016 5:03:04 AM GMT+02:00, Alan Modra wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:43:31AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> Yes, I have been following this entertaining thread.
>
>How to waste lots of time over one bit. Floating point is like that.
>:-)
>
>I see the bug was opened against 5.3, s
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:43:31AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Yes, I have been following this entertaining thread.
How to waste lots of time over one bit. Floating point is like that.
:-)
I see the bug was opened against 5.3, so OK to commit there after a
few days and maybe 4.9 too, Richard?
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:32:58AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> That's good to know. I think the patch is OK but please seek approval from
>> a ppc maintainer as well
>
> There's only one of those. David? Thread starts here
> https://gcc.
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:32:58AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> That's good to know. I think the patch is OK but please seek approval from a
> ppc maintainer as well
There's only one of those. David? Thread starts here
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00213.html
--
Alan Modra
On April 7, 2016 10:03:54 AM GMT+02:00, Alan Modra wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 06:49:19PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:46:48AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > Can you add a testcase or two for the isnormal () case?
>>
>> Sure. I'll adapt the testcase I was using t
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 06:49:19PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:46:48AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Can you add a testcase or two for the isnormal () case?
>
> Sure. I'll adapt the testcase I was using to verify the output,
Revised testcase - target fixed, compiled
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 12:27:36PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Alan Modra writes:
>
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr70117.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr70117.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..99e6f19
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.ta
Alan Modra writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr70117.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr70117.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..99e6f19
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr70117.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +/* { dg-do run { target { { powerpc
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:46:48AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:29:30AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> In general the patch looks like a good approach to me but can we
> >> hide that
> >>
> >> > + const struct
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:29:30AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> In general the patch looks like a good approach to me but can we
>> hide that
>>
>> > + const struct real_format *fmt = FLOAT_MODE_FORMAT (mode);
>> > + bool is_ibm_extended =
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:29:30AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> In general the patch looks like a good approach to me but can we
> hide that
>
> > + const struct real_format *fmt = FLOAT_MODE_FORMAT (mode);
> > + bool is_ibm_extended = fmt->pnan < fmt->p;
>
> in a function somewhere in real.[
11 matches
Mail list logo
