On 01 Sep 18:38, Ilya Tocar wrote:
> > Please mention the PR in the ChangeLog entry and add some testcases
> > (can be gcc.target/i386/, but we should have it tested).
> > Does this change anything on say register short sil __asm ("sil"); in 32-bit
> > mode (when it IMHO should be rejected too?)?
>
> Please mention the PR in the ChangeLog entry and add some testcases
> (can be gcc.target/i386/, but we should have it tested).
> Does this change anything on say register short sil __asm ("sil"); in 32-bit
> mode (when it IMHO should be rejected too?)?
>
Do we support "sil" at all? In i386.h i se
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 02:43:14PM +0400, Ilya Tocar wrote:
> Hi, this patch adds checks for registers availability, when
> alternative/numeric name is used.
> Bootstraps/passes make-check on x86-64.
> Ok for trunk?
>
> ChangeLog:
>
> gcc/
>
> 2014-09-01 Ilya Tocar
>
> * varasm.c (deco
Hi, this patch adds checks for registers availability, when
alternative/numeric name is used.
Bootstraps/passes make-check on x86-64.
Ok for trunk?
ChangeLog:
gcc/
2014-09-01 Ilya Tocar
* varasm.c (decode_reg_name_and_count): Check availability for
registers from ADDITIONAL_R
