Re: [PATCH] PR52665 do not let .ident confuse assembler scan tests

2023-05-31 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc-patches
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:32:04 +0200 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 at 00:19, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > On 06/18/2016 01:31 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > > > > > > 2016-06-18 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > > > > > > PR testsuite/526

testsuite -fno-file [was: Re: [PATCH] PR52665 do not let .ident confuse assembler scan tests]

2022-04-25 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc-patches
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 14:25:22 +0100 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On 19 June 2016 at 22:21, Mike Stump wrote: > > On Jun 18, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > > wrote: > >> > >> A branch with a name matching scan-assembler pattern triggers > >> inappropriate FAIL. > > > >>

Re: [PATCH] PR52665 do not let .ident confuse assembler scan tests

2018-09-05 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 at 00:19, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 06/18/2016 01:31 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > > A branch with a name matching scan-assembler pattern triggers > > inappropriate FAIL. > > > > E.g. branch fixups-testsuite and > > - gcc.target/i386/pr65871-?.c (scan-assembler-not "test")

Re: [PATCH] PR52665 do not let .ident confuse assembler scan tests

2018-05-01 Thread Jeff Law
On 02/02/2018 06:25 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On 19 June 2016 at 22:21, Mike Stump wrote: >> On Jun 18, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer >> wrote: >>> >>> A branch with a name matching scan-assembler pattern triggers >>> inappropriate FAIL. >> >>> The patch below adds -fno

Re: [PATCH] PR52665 do not let .ident confuse assembler scan tests

2018-02-02 Thread Mike Stump
On Feb 2, 2018, at 5:25 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > > Given the overwhelming silence this proposal has received, i take it > for granted that folks are thrilled and even up until now speechless > :) > -fno-ident ok for stage1? > What about -fno-file? Clever alternative suggestions? Do

Re: [PATCH] PR52665 do not let .ident confuse assembler scan tests

2018-02-02 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 19 June 2016 at 22:21, Mike Stump wrote: > On Jun 18, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > wrote: >> >> A branch with a name matching scan-assembler pattern triggers >> inappropriate FAIL. > >> The patch below adds -fno-ident if a testcase contains one of >> scan-assembler, scan-asse

Re: [PATCH] PR52665 do not let .ident confuse assembler scan tests

2016-06-20 Thread Jeff Law
On 06/18/2016 01:31 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: A branch with a name matching scan-assembler pattern triggers inappropriate FAIL. E.g. branch fixups-testsuite and - gcc.target/i386/pr65871-?.c (scan-assembler-not "test") - gcc.target/i386/pr41442.c (scan-assembler-times "test|cmp" 2) etc

Re: [PATCH] PR52665 do not let .ident confuse assembler scan tests

2016-06-19 Thread Mike Stump
On Jun 18, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > > A branch with a name matching scan-assembler pattern triggers > inappropriate FAIL. > The patch below adds -fno-ident if a testcase contains one of > scan-assembler, scan-assembler-not or scan-assembler-times. Kinda gross. I'd

Re: [PATCH] PR52665 do not let .ident confuse assembler scan tests

2016-06-18 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > A branch with a name matching scan-assembler pattern triggers > inappropriate FAIL. > > E.g. branch fixups-testsuite and > - gcc.target/i386/pr65871-?.c (scan-assembler-not "test") > - gcc.target/i386/pr41442.c (scan-assembler-times "test|cmp"

[PATCH] PR52665 do not let .ident confuse assembler scan tests

2016-06-18 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
A branch with a name matching scan-assembler pattern triggers inappropriate FAIL. E.g. branch fixups-testsuite and - gcc.target/i386/pr65871-?.c (scan-assembler-not "test") - gcc.target/i386/pr41442.c (scan-assembler-times "test|cmp" 2) etc. This is a recurring problem as can be seen by some -fno