On Sep 2, 2024, at 4:23 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Andi Kleen writes:
>
> PING^3
Ok.
>> Andi Kleen writes:
>>
>> PING^2 for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-July/658602.html
>>
>> This fixes some musttail related test suite failures that cause noise on
>> various targets.
>>
Andi Kleen writes:
PING^3
> Andi Kleen writes:
>
> PING^2 for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-July/658602.html
>
> This fixes some musttail related test suite failures that cause noise on
> various targets.
>
>> Andi Kleen writes:
>>
>> I wanted to ping this patch. It fixes test
Andi Kleen writes:
PING^2 for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-July/658602.html
This fixes some musttail related test suite failures that cause noise on
various targets.
> Andi Kleen writes:
>
> I wanted to ping this patch. It fixes test suite noise on various
> targets.
>
> http
Andi Kleen writes:
I wanted to ping this patch. It fixes test suite noise on various
targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-July/658602.html
> From: Andi Kleen
>
> This is a new attempt to fix PR116080. The previous try was reverted
> because it just broke a bunch of tests, h
> > Okay for trunk? I would like to check that one in to avoid the noise
> > in the regression reports.
>
> I've tested this version in a few trees.
Thanks Thomas.
> That's because of effective-target 'struct_musttail' for '-m32'
> reporting:
>
> struct_musttail1494739.cc: In function 'foo
Hi Andi!
On 2024-08-02T14:12:59-0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Andi Kleen writes:
>> This is a new attempt to fix PR116080. The previous try was reverted
>> because it just broke a bunch of tests, hiding the problem.
>
> The previous version still had one failure on powerpc because
> of a template ca
Andi Kleen writes:
> From: Andi Kleen
>
> This is a new attempt to fix PR116080. The previous try was reverted
> because it just broke a bunch of tests, hiding the problem.
The previous version still had one failure on powerpc because
of a template call that needs a dg-error check for external_
From: Andi Kleen
This is a new attempt to fix PR116080. The previous try was reverted
because it just broke a bunch of tests, hiding the problem.
- musttail behaves differently than tailcall at -O0. Some of the test
run at -O0, so add separate effective target tests for musttail.
- New effective