On Thu, 2022-05-19 at 06:34 +, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2022, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
>
> > On powerpc64le, the tests related to pr105169 failed because the
> > .localentry was not on a power of two address due to the extra nop
> > instruction taking one byte and thus moving it
On Wed, 18 May 2022, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> On powerpc64le, the tests related to pr105169 failed because the
> .localentry was not on a power of two address due to the extra nop
> instruction taking one byte and thus moving its position one byte
> further. Generating two nops instead moves .l
