On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:57 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> preferred_stack_boundary may not be the minimum stack alignment. For
> leaf functions without TLS access, max_used_stack_slot_alignment may be
> smaller. We should update preferred_stack_boundary for leaf functions.
>
> Tested on i686 and x86-64.
preferred_stack_boundary may not be the minimum stack alignment. For
leaf functions without TLS access, max_used_stack_slot_alignment may be
smaller. We should update preferred_stack_boundary for leaf functions.
Tested on i686 and x86-64. OK for trunk?
H.J.
---
gcc/
PR target/82166