Re: [PATCH] PR target/66819: Allow indirect sibcall with register arguments

2015-07-10 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:58 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:10 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > Indirect sibcall with reg

Re: [PATCH] PR target/66819: Allow indirect sibcall with register arguments

2015-07-10 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:10 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: Indirect sibcall with register arguments is OK when there is register avail

Re: [PATCH] PR target/66819: Allow indirect sibcall with register arguments

2015-07-10 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:10 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> Indirect sibcall with register arguments is OK when there is register >>> available for argument passing. >>> >>> OK for trunk if there is

Re: [PATCH] PR target/66819: Allow indirect sibcall with register arguments

2015-07-10 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> Indirect sibcall with register arguments is OK when there is register >> available for argument passing. >> >> OK for trunk if there is no regression? >> >> >> H.J. >> --- >> gcc/ >> >>

Re: [PATCH] PR target/66819: Allow indirect sibcall with register arguments

2015-07-10 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > Indirect sibcall with register arguments is OK when there is register > available for argument passing. > > OK for trunk if there is no regression? > > > H.J. > --- > gcc/ > > PR target/66819 > * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_ok

Re: [PATCH] PR target/66819: Allow indirect sibcall with register arguments

2015-07-09 Thread H.J. Lu
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> Indirect sibcall with register arguments is OK when there is register >> available for argument passing. >> >> OK for trunk if there is no regression? >> >> >> H.J. >> --- >> gcc/ >> >>

Re: [PATCH] PR target/66819: Allow indirect sibcall with register arguments

2015-07-09 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > Indirect sibcall with register arguments is OK when there is register > available for argument passing. > > OK for trunk if there is no regression? > > > H.J. > --- > gcc/ > > PR target/66819 > * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_ok

[PATCH] PR target/66819: Allow indirect sibcall with register arguments

2015-07-09 Thread H.J. Lu
Indirect sibcall with register arguments is OK when there is register available for argument passing. OK for trunk if there is no regression? H.J. --- gcc/ PR target/66819 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_ok_for_sibcall): Allow indirect sibcall with register arguments