On Sun, 26 Jun 2016, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Alexander Monakov
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Jun 2016, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> The resolver for ifunc functions might resolve to a non-local function.
> >
> > I think the explanation doesn't match the testcase, in which all three
>
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2016, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> The resolver for ifunc functions might resolve to a non-local function.
>
> I think the explanation doesn't match the testcase, in which all three
> functions: the resolver, the symbol being resolve
On Sat, 25 Jun 2016, H.J. Lu wrote:
> The resolver for ifunc functions might resolve to a non-local function.
I think the explanation doesn't match the testcase, in which all three
functions: the resolver, the symbol being resolved, and the ultimate
resolution are all static. I don't think there w
The resolver for ifunc functions might resolve to a non-local function.
Tested on x86 and x86-64. OK for trunk?
H.J.
---
gcc/
PR middle-end/71524
* symtab.c (symtab_node::binds_to_current_def_p): Return false
for IFUNC resolver.
gcc/testsuite/
PR middle-end/715
