> On 31 Mar 2025, at 09:43, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:41 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:36 AM Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>>>
>>> Ping.
>>
>> Can you reference the patch please? I'll note your mails have the tendency
>> to
>> end up in my s
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 3:07 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2025-03-31 at 09:12 +, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
> >
> > > On 31 Mar 2025, at 09:43, Richard Biener
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:41 AM Richard Biener
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:36
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 3:57 PM Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In this testcase GCC tries to expand a VNx4BI vector:
> vector(4) _40;
> _39 = () _24;
> _40 = {_39, _39, _39, _39};
>
> This ends up in a scalarised sequence of bitfield insert operations.
> This is despite the fact that AArch
On Mon, 2025-03-31 at 09:12 +, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>
> > On 31 Mar 2025, at 09:43, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:41 AM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:36 AM Kyrylo Tkachov
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ping.
> > >
> > > Can you
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:36 AM Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>
> Ping.
Can you reference the patch please? I'll note your mails have the tendency to
end up in my spam folder (which is auto-purged after some time). Probably
a setup issue at nvidias side.
Richard.
> Thanks,
> Kyrill
>
> > On 24 Mar 20
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
> On 24 Mar 2025, at 14:28, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In this testcase GCC tries to expand a VNx4BI vector:
> vector(4) _40;
> _39 = () _24;
> _40 = {_39, _39, _39, _39};
>
> This ends up in a scalarised sequence of bitfield insert operations.
> This is despi
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:41 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:36 AM Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
> >
> > Ping.
>
> Can you reference the patch please? I'll note your mails have the tendency to
> end up in my spam folder (which is auto-purged after some time). Probably
> a setup i
Hi all,
In this testcase GCC tries to expand a VNx4BI vector:
vector(4) _40;
_39 = () _24;
_40 = {_39, _39, _39, _39};
This ends up in a scalarised sequence of bitfield insert operations.
This is despite the fact that AArch64 provides a vec_duplicate pattern
specifically for vec_duplicate into V
