On 17/08/18 19:54 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 17/08/18 19:01 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 17/08/18 18:52 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
+ // The tag parameter ensures that in nested tuples each __tuple_base
+ // is a different type and can use the empty base-class optimisation.
+ tem
On 17/08/18 19:01 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 17/08/18 18:52 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
+ // The tag parameter ensures that in nested tuples each __tuple_base
+ // is a different type and can use the empty base-class optimisation.
+ template
+class __tuple_base
Specifically, thi
On 17/08/18 18:52 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
+ // The tag parameter ensures that in nested tuples each __tuple_base
+ // is a different type and can use the empty base-class optimisation.
+ template
+class __tuple_base
Specifically, this would fail if __tuple_base was not a class
temp
PR libstdc++/86963
* include/std/tuple (__tuple_base): New class template with deleted
copy assignment operator.
(tuple, tuple<_T1, _T2>): Derive from __tuple_base so that
implicit copy/move assignment operator will be deleted/suppressed.
(tuple::__a
