On 13/12/18 13:10 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 12:00, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13/12/18 08:56 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 17:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> Ensure we don't try to instantiate __is_constructible_from,
>> because there are two
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 12:00, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On 13/12/18 08:56 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 17:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >>
> >> Ensure we don't try to instantiate __is_constructible_from,
> >> because there are two partial specializations that are equall
On 13/12/18 08:56 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 17:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Ensure we don't try to instantiate __is_constructible_from,
because there are two partial specializations that are equally good
matches.
PR libstdc++/80762
* include/bits/fs_pa
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 17:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Ensure we don't try to instantiate __is_constructible_from,
> because there are two partial specializations that are equally good
> matches.
>
> PR libstdc++/80762
> * include/bits/fs_path.h (path::_Path): Use remove_cv_t and
Ensure we don't try to instantiate __is_constructible_from,
because there are two partial specializations that are equally good
matches.
PR libstdc++/80762
* include/bits/fs_path.h (path::_Path): Use remove_cv_t and is_void.
* include/experimental/bits/fs_path.h (path::_Pa