Yes, it works.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 7:19 AM Harald Anlauf wrote:
>
> Hi H.J.,
>
> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 07. Juni 2020 um 16:02 Uhr
> > Von: "H.J. Lu"
> > An: "Thomas Koenig"
> > Cc: "Harald Anlauf" , "fortran" ,
> &
I've committed the patch below to fix bootstrap.
Sorry for the breakage!
Harald
commit 5aaccde3db39fac7e7f6677ceccc1eadd9c6a424 (HEAD -> master, origin/master,
origin/HEAD)
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Sun Jun 7 16:43:12 2020 +0200
PR fortran/95091 - Buffer overflows with submodules and
Hi H.J.,
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 07. Juni 2020 um 16:02 Uhr
> Von: "H.J. Lu"
> An: "Thomas Koenig"
> Cc: "Harald Anlauf" , "fortran" ,
> "gcc-patches"
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/95091 - Buffer overflows with submodul
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 1:28 AM Thomas Koenig via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi Harald,
>
> > There's another case of buffer overflows when F2008 submodules are used.
> > Buffer sizes are further increased, and checks for overflow are put into
> > place.
> >
> > OK for master?
>
> OK, also for the back
Hi Harald,
There's another case of buffer overflows when F2008 submodules are used.
Buffer sizes are further increased, and checks for overflow are put into
place.
OK for master?
OK, also for the backport.
Thanks a lot!
Regards
Thomas
There's another case of buffer overflows when F2008 submodules are used.
Buffer sizes are further increased, and checks for overflow are put into
place.
OK for master?
I intend to backport to 10 and 9, since I believe the patch is safe.
Thanks,
Harald
PR fortran/95091 - Buffer overflows with s
