Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/82796 -- common entity in equivalence in pure routine

2017-11-02 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 11:48:36AM +, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > Hi Steve, > > I read the correspondence on clf and your earlier posting here. With > those in mind, the patch looks to be OK to commit. > > Thanks > Thanks. The c.l.f posting is addressing a different issue. This patch simp

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/82796 -- common entity in equivalence in pure routine

2017-11-02 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Hi Steve, I read the correspondence on clf and your earlier posting here. With those in mind, the patch looks to be OK to commit. Thanks Paul On 2 November 2017 at 01:09, Steve Kargl wrote: > The attached patch fixes a regression where gfortran was > issuing an error for an entity in a common

[PATCH] PR fortran/82796 -- common entity in equivalence in pure routine

2017-11-01 Thread Steve Kargl
The attached patch fixes a regression where gfortran was issuing an error for an entity in a common block within a module when it appears in equivalence, and the entity *is not* use associated in a pure subprogram. OK to commit? 2017-11-01 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/82796 *