Hi Steve
On 27/12/18 8:58 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 11:24:07AM +, Sudakshina Das wrote:
>> With the failure as:
>>
>> Excess errors:
>> /build/src/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/aligned1.f03:55:14:
>> Error: Arguments of 'iand' have different kind type parameters
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 11:24:07AM +, Sudakshina Das wrote:
> With the failure as:
>
> Excess errors:
> /build/src/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/aligned1.f03:55:14:
> Error: Arguments of 'iand' have different kind type parameters at (1)
> /build/src/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortr
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 11:24:07AM +, Sudakshina Das wrote:
> > PR fortran/45513
> > PR fortran/81509
> > * gfortran.dg/graphite/id-26.f03: Fix non-conforming use of IAND.
> > * gfortran.dg/pr81509_1.f90: New test.
> > * gfortran.dg/pr81509_2.f90: New test.
> >
> This patch
Hi Steve
On 23/12/18 6:49 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> This is a re-submission of a patch I submitted 15 months ago.
> See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-09/msg00124.html
>
> At that time one reviewer OK'd the patch for committing,
> and one reviewer raised objections to the patch as I
> chose to
On 12/23/18 10:49 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
This is a re-submission of a patch I submitted 15 months ago.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-09/msg00124.html
At that time one reviewer OK'd the patch for committing,
and one reviewer raised objections to the patch as I
chose to remove dubious ex
Hi Steve,
The 'call abort’ in the test gfortran.dg/pr81509_1.f90 should be replaced with
‘stop n’.
Thanks for the patch.
Dominique
This is a re-submission of a patch I submitted 15 months ago.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-09/msg00124.html
At that time one reviewer OK'd the patch for committing,
and one reviewer raised objections to the patch as I
chose to remove dubious extensions to the Fortran standard.
I withdre
