Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/77420 -- take two

2016-09-14 Thread Jerry DeLisle
On 09/14/2016 02:49 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: The attached patch appears to fix PR fortran/77420 without causing regressions. The problem raised by Andrew Benson at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-09/msg00039.html contained in pr77420_3.f90 and pr77420_4.f90. The original testcase from the PR

[PATCH] PR fortran/77420 -- take two

2016-09-14 Thread Steve Kargl
The attached patch appears to fix PR fortran/77420 without causing regressions. The problem raised by Andrew Benson at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-09/msg00039.html contained in pr77420_3.f90 and pr77420_4.f90. The original testcase from the PR is in pr77420_1.f90 and a variation on that t