On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 04:08:47PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Le 29/07/2015 18:45, Steve Kargl a écrit :
> >
> > This builds and passes regression testing on x86_64-*-freebsd.
> > OP found the problem by running the sanatizers. I don't
> > know how to build gcc with this as a build option. I'll
Le 29/07/2015 18:45, Steve Kargl a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Mikael Morin wrote:
Le 29/07/2015 13:22, Richard Biener a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Mikael Morin
wrote:
Le 29/07/2015 10:26, Richard
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Mikael Morin wrote:
> > Le 29/07/2015 13:22, Richard Biener a écrit :
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Mikael Morin
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Le 29/07/2015 10:26, Richard Biener a écrit :
>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Le 29/07/2015 13:22, Richard Biener a écrit :
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Mikael Morin
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 29/07/2015 10:26, Richard Biener a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Did you try using vec_safe_splice?
Tha
Le 29/07/2015 13:22, Richard Biener a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Mikael Morin wrote:
Le 29/07/2015 10:26, Richard Biener a écrit :
Did you try using vec_safe_splice?
That handles NULL retargs, not NULL or empty arglist.
I think retargs is NULL.
Not if the patch fixes any
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Le 29/07/2015 10:26, Richard Biener a écrit :
Did you try using vec_safe_splice?
>>
>>
>> That handles NULL retargs, not NULL or empty arglist.
>>
> I think retargs is NULL.
Not if the patch fixes anything.
Richard.
Le 29/07/2015 10:26, Richard Biener a écrit :
Did you try using vec_safe_splice?
That handles NULL retargs, not NULL or empty arglist.
I think retargs is NULL.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:04:52PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
>> Le 21/07/2015 21:08, Steve Kargl a ?crit :
>> > When C++ was injected into trans-expr.c in the form of vec,
>> > it seems whomever did the conversion to vec forgot to check
>> > f
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:04:52PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Le 21/07/2015 21:08, Steve Kargl a ?crit :
> > When C++ was injected into trans-expr.c in the form of vec,
> > it seems whomever did the conversion to vec forgot to check
> > for a NULL C++ thing. This patch seems to avoid the problem
Le 21/07/2015 21:08, Steve Kargl a écrit :
When C++ was injected into trans-expr.c in the form of vec,
it seems whomever did the conversion to vec forgot to check
for a NULL C++ thing. This patch seems to avoid the problem,
but having zero knowledge of C++ I could be wrong.
OK for trunk?
2015-
When C++ was injected into trans-expr.c in the form of vec,
it seems whomever did the conversion to vec forgot to check
for a NULL C++ thing. This patch seems to avoid the problem,
but having zero knowledge of C++ I could be wrong.
OK for trunk?
2015-07-21 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/
11 matches
Mail list logo
