On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:39:18PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
>
> >Oh phew. Good catch. I wasn't dealing with
> >the possible white space issues. Here's an
> >updated patch and testcase.
> >
>
> OK for trunk. Could you also add the test case a second time,
> without -std=f95,
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:39:18PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
>
> >Oh phew. Good catch. I wasn't dealing with
> >the possible white space issues. Here's an
> >updated patch and testcase.
> >
>
> OK for trunk. Could you also add the test case a second time,
> without -std=f95,
Hi Steve,
Oh phew. Good catch. I wasn't dealing with
the possible white space issues. Here's an
updated patch and testcase.
OK for trunk. Could you also add the test case a second time,
without -std=f95, to make sure it keeps passing?
Thanks for the patch!
Thomas
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 05:59:29PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> it seems that, with your patch,
>
>interface foo
> module procedure::bar
>end interface
>
> is rejected, as is
>
> interface foo
> module procuedure:: bar
> end interface
>
> Is this the way i
Hi Steve,
it seems that, with your patch,
interface foo
module procedure::bar
end interface
is rejected, as is
interface foo
module procuedure:: bar
end interface
Is this the way it is supposed to be?
Thomas
The attached patch allows for F2008's optional double
colon in a module procedure statement. Built and
regression tested on trunk. OK for trunk and 4.6?
Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/49265
* decl.c (gfc_match_modproc): Allow for a double colon in a module
procedure stateme
