On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 20:18 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On March 1, 2016 7:51:01 PM GMT+01:00, David Malcolm <
> dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > The wording of our output from -Wmisleading-indentation is rather
> > confusing, as noted by Reddit user "sysop073" here:
> > https://www.reddit.com/r/
On 02/03/16 04:20, Patrick Palka wrote:
Using this wording order makes it seem that the problem is with the if
statement, because we emit a warning about it and then emit "only" a
note for the misleadingly-indented goto statement.
... on second thought, I may be overthinking the semantic differ
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:51 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>> The wording of our output from -Wmisleading-indentation is rather
>> confusing, as noted by Reddit user "sysop073" here:
>>
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/47pejg/gcc_
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:51 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> The wording of our output from -Wmisleading-indentation is rather
> confusing, as noted by Reddit user "sysop073" here:
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/47pejg/gcc_6_wmisleadingindentation_vs_goto_fail/d0eonwd
>
>> The way t
On March 1, 2016 7:51:01 PM GMT+01:00, David Malcolm
wrote:
>The wording of our output from -Wmisleading-indentation is rather
>confusing, as noted by Reddit user "sysop073" here:
>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/47pejg/gcc_6_wmisleadingindentation_vs_goto_fail/d0eonwd
>
>> The way
The wording of our output from -Wmisleading-indentation is rather
confusing, as noted by Reddit user "sysop073" here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/47pejg/gcc_6_wmisleadingindentation_vs_goto_fail/d0eonwd
> The way they split up the warning looks designed to trick you.
> sslKeyEx
