On 06/24/2015 06:55 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I'm finishing retesting the amended patch and, if everything goes well,
I will apply it to trunk, as approved by Jason (only additional minor
tweak: testcase in cpp0x instead of cpp1y).
What about gcc-5-branch? It's a regression.
I think this is saf
Hi,
On 04/14/2015 11:34 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/14/2015 05:27 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
On 2015-04-10 15:57, Adam Butcher wrote:
+ cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
Actually there should be two of these as the 'auto' isn't consumed yet.
OK.
I'm finishing retesting the
On 04/14/2015 05:27 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
On 2015-04-10 15:57, Adam Butcher wrote:
+ cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
Actually there should be two of these as the 'auto' isn't consumed yet.
OK.
Jason
On 2015-04-10 15:57, Adam Butcher wrote:
+ cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
Actually there should be two of these as the 'auto' isn't consumed yet.
* cp/parser.c (cp_parser_simple_type_specifier): Don't synthesize
implicit template parm if 'auto' is a placeholder for trailing return
type.
---
gcc/cp/parser.c | 23 +++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr65750.C | 12
2 fil
