On 01/12/2012 09:21 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
This is the udpated patch that I have tested and am about to bootstrap.
OK.
Jason
Jason Merrill writes:
> On 01/11/2012 05:57 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> + list = cur_stmt_list;
>> if (TREE_CODE (list) == BIND_EXPR)
>> list = BIND_EXPR_BODY (list);
>> if (TREE_CODE (list) == STATEMENT_LIST
>
> cur_stmt_list should always be a STATEMENT_LIST, so these
On 01/11/2012 05:57 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
+ list = cur_stmt_list;
if (TREE_CODE (list) == BIND_EXPR)
list = BIND_EXPR_BODY (list);
if (TREE_CODE (list) == STATEMENT_LIST
cur_stmt_list should always be a STATEMENT_LIST, so these tests are
unnecessary.
Jason
Paolo Carlini writes:
> ... watch out trailing blank lines ;)
Hopefully fixed below. Thanks for watching.
gcc/cp/
* semantics.c (cp_parser_ctor_initializer_opt_and_function_body):
Set the pointer to the last block of the constructor to the
current statement.
(b
... watch out trailing blank lines ;)
Thanks!
Paolo
Hello,
Consider this short code snippet:
struct A
{
~A();
};
struct B
{
A a;
constexpr B() {}
};
As explained in the audit trail, this is valid code.
G++ ICEs on it because build_constexpr_constructor_member_initializers
chokes on a CLEANUP_STMT.
