On 11/06/20 08:32 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
As we are on patching algos we still have this old one.
   From the original patch I only kept the memory optimization part
as the new performance test was not showing good result for the other
part to change pivot value. I als
Gentle reminder now that we are in stage 3 ?
On 24/06/20 7:39 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 11/06/20 08:32 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
As we are on patching algos we still have this old one.
   From the original patch I only kept the memory optimization
part as the new p
On 24/06/20 7:39 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 11/06/20 08:32 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
As we are on patching algos we still have this old one.
   From the original patch I only kept the memory optimization
part as the new performance test was not showing good result for
On 11/06/20 08:32 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
As we are on patching algos we still have this old one.
   From the original patch I only kept the memory optimization part
as the new performance test was not showing good result for the other
part to change pivot value. I als
Gentle remider.
On 11/06/20 8:32 am, François Dumont wrote:
As we are on patching algos we still have this old one.
From the original patch I only kept the memory optimization part
as the new performance test was not showing good result for the other
part to change pivot value. I also k
As we are on patching algos we still have this old one.
From the original patch I only kept the memory optimization part as
the new performance test was not showing good result for the other part
to change pivot value. I also kept the small change in
get_temporary_buffer even if I don't ha
