On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 4:37 PM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <
rep.dot@gmail.com> wrote:
> Janne,
>
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 at 20:57, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> >
> > Hi Janne,
> >
> > > PING
> >
> > Looks good for trunk. Thanks!
>
> AFAICS this removed the last user of
>
> static void
> init_unsigned_
Janne,
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 at 20:57, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> Hi Janne,
>
> > PING
>
> Looks good for trunk. Thanks!
AFAICS this removed the last user of
static void
init_unsigned_integer
which manifests itself as
../../../../../src/gcc-9.0.mine/libgfortran/runtime/environ.c:104:1:
warning: ‘
Hi Janne,
PING
Looks good for trunk. Thanks!
Since this is a change in user-visible behavior,
will you also document this in gcc-8/changes.html ?
If you prefer me to do this (haven't installed CVS
or something :-) just drop me a line.
Regards
Thomas
PING
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Janne Blomqvist
wrote:
> The current F2018 draft (N2137) specifies behavior of the RECL=
> specifier in the INQUIRE statement, where it previously was left as
> undefined. Namely:
>
> - If the unit is not connected, RECL= should be given the value -1.
> - If
The current F2018 draft (N2137) specifies behavior of the RECL=
specifier in the INQUIRE statement, where it previously was left as
undefined. Namely:
- If the unit is not connected, RECL= should be given the value -1.
- If the unit is connected with stream access, RECL= should be given
the valu
