On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 12:01, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> OK for trunk, sorry for not getting to it sooner.
P.S. I do think this one would have been OK to commit as obvious,
since it's just removing an unused variable and so has no effect on
anything.
>
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 21:13, François Dum
OK for trunk, sorry for not getting to it sooner.
On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 21:13, François Dumont via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> Still no chance to review ?
>
> On 14/11/22 18:56, François Dumont wrote:
> > Gentle reminder.
> >
> > Sorry if I should have committed it as trivial but I cannot do it
> > anym
Still no chance to review ?
On 14/11/22 18:56, François Dumont wrote:
Gentle reminder.
Sorry if I should have committed it as trivial but I cannot do it
anymore now that I asked :-)
On 12/10/22 22:18, François Dumont wrote:
libstdc++: Remove _Alloc_node instance in _Rb_tree [PR107189]
Gentle reminder.
Sorry if I should have committed it as trivial but I cannot do it
anymore now that I asked :-)
On 12/10/22 22:18, François Dumont wrote:
libstdc++: Remove _Alloc_node instance in _Rb_tree [PR107189]
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/107189
*
libstdc++: Remove _Alloc_node instance in _Rb_tree [PR107189]
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/107189
* include/bits/stl_tree.h
(_Rb_tree<>::_M_insert_range_equal): Remove
unused _Alloc_node instance.
Ok to commit ?
François
diff --git a/libstd
