On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:47 AM Simon Marchi wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-28 2:31 p.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>> Unlike gdb, binutils should have as few external depecies as possible.
> >>> debuginfod brings in some so many external depecies.
> >>
> >> I'm not a binutils maintainer, so that's not my role to
On 2020-07-28 2:31 p.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> Unlike gdb, binutils should have as few external depecies as possible.
>>> debuginfod brings in some so many external depecies.
>>
>> I'm not a binutils maintainer, so that's not my role to decide about that
>> tradeoff... but we are talking about having
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:43 AM Simon Marchi wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-28 1:26 p.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:28 AM Simon Marchi wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2020-07-28 12:07 p.m., H.J. Lu via Gdb-patches wrote:
> >>> What doesn't work with my pkg.m4 change?
> >>
> >> (1) It deviates from
On 2020-07-28 1:26 p.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:28 AM Simon Marchi wrote:
>>
>> On 2020-07-28 12:07 p.m., H.J. Lu via Gdb-patches wrote:
>>> What doesn't work with my pkg.m4 change?
>>
>> (1) It deviates from upstream. I don't think we should do this unless
>> absolutely n
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:28 AM Simon Marchi wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-28 12:07 p.m., H.J. Lu via Gdb-patches wrote:
> > What doesn't work with my pkg.m4 change?
>
> (1) It deviates from upstream. I don't think we should do this unless
> absolutely needed. That's not the case here, the change is
On 2020-07-28 12:07 p.m., H.J. Lu via Gdb-patches wrote:
> What doesn't work with my pkg.m4 change?
(1) It deviates from upstream. I don't think we should do this unless
absolutely needed. That's not the case here, the change is just there
because you don't want to set up pkg-config prop
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:13 AM Simon Marchi wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-28 11:05 a.m., H.J. Lu via Gdb-patches wrote:
> >> Can you clarify how this magic works, is this standard autoconf? Because
> >> I am trying this
> >> on Fedora, so pretty much the same setup as you, and I don't see this
> >> be
On 2020-07-28 11:05 a.m., H.J. Lu via Gdb-patches wrote:
>> Can you clarify how this magic works, is this standard autoconf? Because I
>> am trying this
>> on Fedora, so pretty much the same setup as you, and I don't see this
>> behavior:
>>
>> $ /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/configure CC="gcc -
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:34 AM Simon Marchi wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-28 10:11 a.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:01 AM Simon Marchi wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2020-07-28 9:56 a.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 6:51 AM Andreas Schwab
> >>> wrote:
>
> On Jul 28 20
On Jul 28 2020, H.J. Lu wrote:
> My system supports both -m32 and -m64.
My system also supports m68k. That doesn't make it "native".
$ file hello.m68k
hello.m68k: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, Motorola m68k, 68020, version 1 (SYSV),
dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld., for GNU/Linux 2.6.32,
On 2020-07-28 10:11 a.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:01 AM Simon Marchi wrote:
>>
>> On 2020-07-28 9:56 a.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 6:51 AM Andreas Schwab
>>> wrote:
On Jul 28 2020, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
> On x86, the native GCC can s
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:01 AM Simon Marchi wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-28 9:56 a.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 6:51 AM Andreas Schwab
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jul 28 2020, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
> >>
> >>> On x86, the native GCC can support -m32 and -m64. "gcc -m32" or "gcc
>
On 2020-07-28 9:56 a.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 6:51 AM Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 28 2020, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
>>
>>> On x86, the native GCC can support -m32 and -m64. "gcc -m32" or "gcc -m64"
>>> are not cross compiling.
>>
>> You cannot link -m64 and -m32 tog
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 6:51 AM Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> On Jul 28 2020, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
>
> > On x86, the native GCC can support -m32 and -m64. "gcc -m32" or "gcc -m64"
> > are not cross compiling.
>
> You cannot link -m64 and -m32 together.
>
> > I didn't set PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR and
On 2020-07-28 9:33 a.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
> On x86, the native GCC can support -m32 and -m64. "gcc -m32" or "gcc -m64"
> are not cross compiling.
And how does that make it not cross-compîling?
>> Anyway regardless of vocabulary, I don't think there was a problem to begin
>> with (not that I blam
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 6:33 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:46 AM Simon Marchi wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-07-28 6:45 a.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:32 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:14 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Jul
On Jul 28 2020, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
> On x86, the native GCC can support -m32 and -m64. "gcc -m32" or "gcc -m64"
> are not cross compiling.
You cannot link -m64 and -m32 together.
> I didn't set PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR and I don't want to set it.
Then use the correct pkg-config for your tar
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:46 AM Simon Marchi wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-28 6:45 a.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:32 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:14 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:11 AM Aaron Merey wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul
Hi,
On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 12:32 -0700, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
> diff --git a/config/pkg.m4 b/config/pkg.m4
> index 13a8890178..45587e97c8 100644
> --- a/config/pkg.m4
> +++ b/config/pkg.m4
> @@ -147,6 +147,12 @@ AC_MSG_CHECKING([for $2])
> _PKG_CONFIG([$1][_CFLAGS], [cflags], [$2])
> _PKG_C
On 2020-07-28 6:45 a.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:32 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:14 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:11 AM Aaron Merey wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:32 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 a
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:32 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:14 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:11 AM Aaron Merey wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:32 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 9:01 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > > > Th
e is the updated patch
which only adds AC_TRY_LINK to PKG_CHECK_MODULES to check if
$pkg_cv_[]$1[]_LIBS works.
--
H.J.
From 44682ce298a8ce2b795303d4054ec532847bfcae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H.J. Lu"
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 08:24:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] PKG_CHECK_MODULES: Check if
comments or objections?
--
H.J.
From 42d49b1444ad6c8475672f6a6a16810d9e7c15ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H.J. Lu"
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 08:24:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] PKG_CHECK_MODULES: Check if $pkg_cv_[]$1[]_LIBS works
It is quite normal to have headers without library on multi
23 matches
Mail list logo
