On 3/17/21 9:33 AM, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 3/5/2021 9:46 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Although this is an Objective-C++ patch, I need to touch stuff outside
“objc local”
contexts, so think it needs review,
(this is a regression fix for all open branches).
I believe Jason is on PTO. Y
On 3/5/2021 9:46 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Although this is an Objective-C++ patch, I need to touch stuff outside
“objc local”
contexts, so think it needs review,
(this is a regression fix for all open branches).
I believe Jason is on PTO. You might need to ping him directly when he
returns
Iain Sandoe wrote:
Although this is an Objective-C++ patch, I need to touch stuff outside
“objc local”
contexts, so think it needs review,
(this is a regression fix for all open branches).
Iain Sandoe wrote:
We were discussing proposed reflection splicing syntax - [:reflection:]
in SG7
Although this is an Objective-C++ patch, I need to touch stuff outside
“objc local”
contexts, so think it needs review,
(this is a regression fix for all open branches).
Iain Sandoe wrote:
We were discussing proposed reflection splicing syntax - [:reflection:]
in SG7
which has some simila
Hi.
We were discussing proposed reflection splicing syntax - [:reflection:] in SG7
which has some similarities with objective-c++ message syntax with unnamed
params.
This reminded me that we have a *very* long-standing regression against
objective-c++ where it is not able to handle unnamed messag
