On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 11:00 AM Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 4:14 PM Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2021/7/7 21:20, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:19 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 2021/6/28 16:25, Richard
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 4:14 PM Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/7/7 21:20, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:19 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2021/6/28 16:25, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:07 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
> >>
On 2021/7/7 21:20, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:19 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2021/6/28 16:25, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:07 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
On 2021/6/25 18:02, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:19 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/6/28 16:25, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:07 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2021/6/25 18:02, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:41 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
>
>
> >>
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 4:26 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:07 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2021/6/25 18:02, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:41 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 2021/6/25 16:54, Richard Biener wrote:
On 2021/6/28 16:25, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:07 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2021/6/25 18:02, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:41 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
On 2021/6/25 16:54, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:07 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/6/25 18:02, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:41 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2021/6/25 16:54, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:34 AM Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches
> >>> wro
On 2021/6/25 18:02, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:41 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2021/6/25 16:54, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:34 AM Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches
>>> wrote:
From: Xiong Hu Luo
adjust_iv_update_pos in tree
On 2021/6/25 18:02, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:41 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
On 2021/6/25 16:54, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:34 AM Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches
wrote:
From: Xiong Hu Luo
adjust_iv_update_pos in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts doesn't help pe
+cc Xinliang David Li since he introduced the function
adjust_iv_update_pos. Looking forward to the input. :)
On 2021/6/25 18:02, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:41 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
On 2021/6/25 16:54, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:34 AM Xionghu Lu
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:41 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/6/25 16:54, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:34 AM Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Xiong Hu Luo
> >>
> >> adjust_iv_update_pos in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts doesn't help performance
> >> on P
On 2021/6/25 16:54, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:34 AM Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches
wrote:
From: Xiong Hu Luo
adjust_iv_update_pos in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts doesn't help performance
on Power. For example, it generates mismatched address offset after
adjust iv update state
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:34 AM Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> From: Xiong Hu Luo
>
> adjust_iv_update_pos in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts doesn't help performance
> on Power. For example, it generates mismatched address offset after
> adjust iv update statement position:
>
> [local count: 709
From: Xiong Hu Luo
adjust_iv_update_pos in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts doesn't help performance
on Power. For example, it generates mismatched address offset after
adjust iv update statement position:
[local count: 70988443]:
_84 = MEM[(uint8_t *)ip_229 + ivtmp.30_414 * 1];
ivtmp.30_415 = ivtmp.30_41
14 matches
Mail list logo