On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 12:30, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 10:47, François Dumont wrote:
>
>> Ok, push done.
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>> Even after full rebuild those tests are still UNRESOLVED on my system.
>>
> What is the error in the log?
>
> What is your system? How and where
On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 10:47, François Dumont wrote:
> Ok, push done.
>
Thanks.
> Even after full rebuild those tests are still UNRESOLVED on my system.
>
What is the error in the log?
What is your system? How and where did you install "OMP"?
Does the libgomp directory exist in the GCC build
Ok, push done.
Even after full rebuild those tests are still UNRESOLVED on my system.
Yes, I also noticed that I could remove this check. I'll propose it later.
François
On 02/06/2023 09:43, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 08:33, François Dumont wrote:
I haven't been able to
On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 08:33, François Dumont wrote:
> I haven't been able to reproduce so far.
>
> Here is however a patch that I think will fix the problem. At least
> failing tests are UNRESOLVED on my system.
>
> libstdc++: Fix broken _GLIBCXX_PARALLEL mode
>
> Add missing include in .
I haven't been able to reproduce so far.
Here is however a patch that I think will fix the problem. At least
failing tests are UNRESOLVED on my system.
libstdc++: Fix broken _GLIBCXX_PARALLEL mode
Add missing include in .
Detect availability of in tests needing it to make them
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, 21:37 François Dumont via Libstdc++, <
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> It's of course not as easy as I thought.
>
> I would never have detected this problem on my system because I'm
> missing omp.h.
>
> I've implemented and added a:
>
> // { dg-require-effective-target omp }
>
It's of course not as easy as I thought.
I would never have detected this problem on my system because I'm
missing omp.h.
I've implemented and added a:
// { dg-require-effective-target omp }
so that now those tests are UNRESOLVED rather than PASS.
Now I've install OMP and try to rebuild lib
Sorry, I had fully tested the move from bits/stl_algo.h to
bits/stl_algobase.h.
But it appears that the script I used to run the tests after the other move
has not done what I expected.
I'll provide the patch shortly.
Le jeu. 1 juin 2023 à 14:06, Jonathan Wakely a écrit :
>
>
> On Thu, 1 Jun
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 12:52, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches writes:
>
> > On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 18:39, François Dumont via Libstdc++ <
> > libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> >> libstdc++: Reduce inclusion to
> >>
> >>
> >> Move the std::search definition from stl_algo.h
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches writes:
> On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 18:39, François Dumont via Libstdc++ <
> libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> libstdc++: Reduce inclusion to
>>
>>
>> Move the std::search definition from stl_algo.h to stl_algobase.h and use
>> the later in .
>>
>> For consistency
On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 18:39, François Dumont via Libstdc++ <
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> libstdc++: Reduce inclusion to
>
>
> Move the std::search definition from stl_algo.h to stl_algobase.h and use
> the later in .
>
> For consistency also move std::__parallel::search and associated helpe
libstdc++: Reduce inclusion to
Move the std::search definition from stl_algo.h to stl_algobase.h and use
the later in .
For consistency also move std::__parallel::search and associated helpers
from
to so that
std::__parallel::search
is accessible along with std::search.
libstdc++-v3/Cha
12 matches
Mail list logo
