Mikhail Maltsev writes:
> On 10.06.2015 10:05, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> +/* Structure which holds data, required for generating stub gen_*
>>> function. */
>>
>> No comma after "data"
>>
>>> +/* These instructions require default stub function. Stubs are never
>>> called.
>>
>> "require
On 10.06.2015 10:05, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> +/* Structure which holds data, required for generating stub gen_* function.
>> */
>
> No comma after "data"
>
>> +/* These instructions require default stub function. Stubs are never
>> called.
>
> "require a default"
>
[snip]
> Seems like t
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 07:28:10AM +0300, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I noticed that defaults.h file contains stub generator functions which
> simply call gcc_unreachable. FWIW, Trevor added them to remove some
> conditional compilation which depends on HAVE_ macros (I mean
> something l
Richard Sandiford writes:
> There again, this is a generator, so those kinds of concerns aren't
> particularly important. If we do keep the above though, I think we
> should put the hasher in hash-map-table.h now.
Of course I mean hash-map-traits.h :-)
Mikhail Maltsev writes:
> Hi, all.
>
> I noticed that defaults.h file contains stub generator functions which
> simply call gcc_unreachable. FWIW, Trevor added them to remove some
> conditional compilation which depends on HAVE_ macros (I mean
> something like r223624).
>
> Because we still have ~
Hi, all.
I noticed that defaults.h file contains stub generator functions which
simply call gcc_unreachable. FWIW, Trevor added them to remove some
conditional compilation which depends on HAVE_ macros (I mean
something like r223624).
Because we still have ~80 more such conditions in GCC, and pro
