On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
> As discussed in the other thread, I can't just remove folding from the
> C FE and implement it on GIMPLE level, because that regressed some of
> those not-really-kosher static initializers. Instead, fold-const.c
> has to be taught how to fold PTR0 - (PTR
As discussed in the other thread, I can't just remove folding from the
C FE and implement it on GIMPLE level, because that regressed some of
those not-really-kosher static initializers. Instead, fold-const.c
has to be taught how to fold PTR0 - (PTR1 p+ A). (Now it sounds so
obvious.) I added som
