On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 03:14:29PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 08/18/2018 12:24 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > Removing Init is *wrong* as far as I see; it changes things, anyway.
> > Could you not have done this as a separate patch?
>
> It's already in, but it should be fine. Note that I a
t;>
>
>> >From 0a7d5cd6cd6ca0586a350b95cd8f6ded095ba9c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: marxin
>> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:40:24 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] Merge Ignore and Deprecated in .opt files.
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2018-07-18 Mar
t; > did something useful?
> >
>
> That's not intended, I fixed that. It the patch acceptable in form in which
> it is?
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
> >From 0a7d5cd6cd6ca0586a350b95cd8f6ded095ba9c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: marxin
> Date: Wed, 1
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 08/15/2018 06:38 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Aug 2018, Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> >> Ok, so you have very similar opinion as Jakub. Thus I'm sending new
> >> version that preserves status quo, it only does:
> >
> > This is removing RejectN
ble in form in which it
is?
Thanks,
Martin
>From 0a7d5cd6cd6ca0586a350b95cd8f6ded095ba9c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:40:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Merge Ignore and Deprecated in .opt files.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018-07-18 Martin Liska
* common.opt: Remove Warn, Init and
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018, Martin Liška wrote:
> Ok, so you have very similar opinion as Jakub. Thus I'm sending new
> version that preserves status quo, it only does:
This is removing RejectNegative from some Deprecated options. Won't that
result in the -fno-* variants of those options starting to
gs from test-suite, if a test was testing only that,
then I removed the test
4) I simplifies warning reporting mechanism for Deprecated options.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Martin
>From 68edcd24e0a12d21b6eaca68596a9e4d7fd8ae
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018, Martin Liška wrote:
> +C++ ObjC++ Ignore)
Stray ')' at the end of this line.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Martin Liška wrote:
> I must admit that was my intention :) In my eyes it makes it more consistent
> and
> it gives consumers feedback about usage of an option that does nothing.
> For x86_64 there's list of options that are Ignore and don't produce a
> warning:
The design
tached version of the patch.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Martin
>
> Jakub
>
>From 2698b0af3fbd7c0f0372513dc00673932c48b6cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:40:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Merge Ignore and Depreca
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 04:16:10PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> I must admit that was my intention :) In my eyes it makes it more consistent
> and
> it gives consumers feedback about usage of an option that does nothing.
> For x86_64 there's list of options that are Ignore and don't produce a
> w
On 07/19/2018 03:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 03:25:15PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Few weeks ago I added new Deprecated flag for options. Apparently, there's
>> one similar called Ignore. Thus I moved all Deprecated to Ignore and for
>> all Ignored I do a warning of fol
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 03:25:15PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> Few weeks ago I added new Deprecated flag for options. Apparently, there's
> one similar called Ignore. Thus I moved all Deprecated to Ignore and for
> all Ignored I do a warning of following format:
>
> $ xgcc: warning: switch ‘-mmpx
Hi.
Few weeks ago I added new Deprecated flag for options. Apparently, there's
one similar called Ignore. Thus I moved all Deprecated to Ignore and for
all Ignored I do a warning of following format:
$ xgcc: warning: switch ‘-mmpx’ is no longer supported
After that there were quite some usages f
14 matches
Mail list logo
