On 03/07/14 13:40 +0100, Goncalo Carvalho wrote:
Hi,
Many thanks! I'll try add a test to the suite (unsure how foolproof
will be in terms of detecting memory usage).
Yes, it might not be worth adding to the testsuite, but I want to be
able to verify the patch changes something :-)
The 11000
Hi,
Many thanks! I'll try add a test to the suite (unsure how foolproof
will be in terms of detecting memory usage).
The 11000 is simply to go beyond the minimum unique_count needed to
specialise the parallel version. This was on
g++ (GCC) 4.4.5 20110214 (Red Hat 4.4.5-6) but the issue still exis
On 02/07/14 22:42 +0100, Goncalo Carvalho wrote:
Hi,
In parallel/unique_copy.h __counter is never deleted.
I'm also trying to follow from other posts how to submit a patch but
is well possible I missed some of the conventions. Many apologies if
that's the case.
Thanks for this, it looks corre
Hi,
In parallel/unique_copy.h __counter is never deleted.
I'm also trying to follow from other posts how to submit a patch but
is well possible I missed some of the conventions. Many apologies if
that's the case.
libstdc++-v3/
* include/parallel/unique_copy.h: prevent memory leak of __counter
