> >>> I think this remapping should happen with `file-prefix-map` but
> >>> shouldn't with `debug-prefix-map` (though if it happens for both it's
> >>> also not too bad) and I believe this patch is the minimum change to
> >>> achieve that. I think it makes sense to make this follow
> >>> `macro-pre
Hi Yichao,
Forwarding to fort...@gcc.gnu.org as suggested by Dominique d'Humieres.
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 9:29 PM Yichao Yu wrote:
I think this remapping should happen with `file-prefix-map` but
shouldn't with `debug-prefix-map` (though if it happens for both it's
also not too bad) and I be
> > > I think this remapping should happen with `file-prefix-map` but
> > > shouldn't with `debug-prefix-map` (though if it happens for both it's
> > > also not too bad) and I believe this patch is the minimum change to
> > > achieve that. I think it makes sense to make this follow
> > > `macro-pre
Forwarding to fort...@gcc.gnu.org as suggested by Dominique d'Humieres.
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 9:29 PM Yichao Yu wrote:
>
> > I think this remapping should happen with `file-prefix-map` but
> > shouldn't with `debug-prefix-map` (though if it happens for both it's
> > also not too bad) and I belie
> I think this remapping should happen with `file-prefix-map` but
> shouldn't with `debug-prefix-map` (though if it happens for both it's
> also not too bad) and I believe this patch is the minimum change to
> achieve that. I think it makes sense to make this follow
> `macro-prefix-map` although I'
Sorry I think I accidentally had rich text mode on and also forgot the
`[PATCH]` in the title in the previous email... Try again...
Currently this is using the macro prefix map without allowing the
-fmacro-prefix-map argument, which is arguably pretty weird... but I
don't know what would be a bett
