Hi,
Jeff Law writes:
> On 6/11/23 23:44, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>>>
Hi,
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>>
On 6/11/23 23:44, Jiufu Guo wrote:
Richard Biener writes:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
Hi,
Richard Biener writes:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
Hi,
Richard Biener writes:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
guojiufu writes:
Hi,
On 2023-06-09 16:00,
Hi,
Richard Biener writes:
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Richard Biener writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
On Mon, 12 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>
> > On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Richard Biener writes:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> Richard Biener writes:
> >> >>
> >> >>
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Richard Biener writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> guojiufu
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Richard Biener writes:
>
> > On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Richard Biener writes:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> guojiufu writes:
> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
Hi,
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> >
>> >> guojiufu writes:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > On 2023-06-09 16:00, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> >> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, J
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Richard Biener writes:
>
> > On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >
> >> guojiufu writes:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On 2023-06-09 16:00, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Hi,
> >> >>>
Hi,
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> guojiufu writes:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On 2023-06-09 16:00, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> As checking the code, there is a "gcc_assert (SCALAR_INT_MO
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> guojiufu writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2023-06-09 16:00, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> As checking the code, there is a "gcc_assert (SCALAR_INT_MODE_P
> >>> (mode))"
> >>> in "try_const_anc
guojiufu writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-06-09 16:00, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As checking the code, there is a "gcc_assert (SCALAR_INT_MODE_P
>>> (mode))"
>>> in "try_const_anchors".
>>> This assert seems correct because the function try_const_
Hi,
On 2023-06-09 16:00, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
Hi,
As checking the code, there is a "gcc_assert (SCALAR_INT_MODE_P
(mode))"
in "try_const_anchors".
This assert seems correct because the function try_const_anchors cares
about integer values currently, and
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As checking the code, there is a "gcc_assert (SCALAR_INT_MODE_P (mode))"
> in "try_const_anchors".
> This assert seems correct because the function try_const_anchors cares
> about integer values currently, and modes other than SCALAR_INT_MODE_P
> are
Hi,
As checking the code, there is a "gcc_assert (SCALAR_INT_MODE_P (mode))"
in "try_const_anchors".
This assert seems correct because the function try_const_anchors cares
about integer values currently, and modes other than SCALAR_INT_MODE_P
are not needed to support.
This patch makes sure SCALA
14 matches
Mail list logo