arning_name. */
>> + warning (0, "command-line error argument %qs is not valid for %s",
>> + text, bad_lang);
>>
>> It might be better phrased as something like
>>
>> "%<-Werror=%> argument %qs is not valid for %s"
>
ot valid for %s"
>
> The argument is not one of a "command-line error." It's one
> to the -Werror option (which can be specified in other places
> besides the command line).
I like language corrections from native speakers.
I'm sending updated version of the p
On 7/16/19 5:16 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
I noticed in the PR that -Werror=argument argument is not verified
that the option is supported by a language we compile for.
That's changed in the patch. However, it's not ideal as I need to mark
the -Werror as the problematic option and one can't pri
Hi.
I noticed in the PR that -Werror=argument argument is not verified
that the option is supported by a language we compile for.
That's changed in the patch. However, it's not ideal as I need to mark
the -Werror as the problematic option and one can't print a proper
list of valid languages for wh
