Re: [PATCH] Make VEC_COND_EXPR a GIMPLE_TERNARY_RHS

2011-09-01 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote: > > $subject says it all, COND_EXPR to follow. rhs1 will still be > a "single" tree, namely a is_gimple_condexpr () operand. That's > not easy to change (without forcing it to a separate statement, > thus making it a is_gimple_val) because it embeds

[PATCH] Make VEC_COND_EXPR a GIMPLE_TERNARY_RHS

2011-08-31 Thread Richard Guenther
$subject says it all, COND_EXPR to follow. rhs1 will still be a "single" tree, namely a is_gimple_condexpr () operand. That's not easy to change (without forcing it to a separate statement, thus making it a is_gimple_val) because it embeds another tree code. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-un